Embryology Biology 441 Spring 2013 Albert Harris
Limb bud development
Limb buds develop into legs, arms, wings, or fins.
If you cut an early limb bud in two, it can form 2 arms, or often it will form a branched leg (mirror images).
Fusing two limb buds can often form only one leg.
Notice the similarity to what Driesch discovered!
Several body organs have been discovered to form two organs, for example two complete hearts.
And often you can cause pairs of organs to fuse into one:
The human uterus also forms by side to side fusion of the lower end of the oviduct. (Muellerian Duct)
Some kinds of parasitic worms often split limb buds in frogs, resulting in 5 or 6 hind limbs!
Surgical grafting of olfactory placodes, or inner ear placodes, to the side of an animal between the front and hind legs will cause the tissue there to "grow" (reorganize) into a fifth leg!
Another way to cause formation of extra legs is by surgical insertion of small absorbent plastic beads of beads soaked in one of the proteins called fibroblast growth factor. ("FGF").
Probably grafted olfactory placodes, etc. produce their effect by secreting FGF, but perhaps that's an over-simplification.
Apparently induction phenomena use (and re-use!) a small number of chemical signals. In this case the developing inner ear signals to the tissues around it using the same proteins as are also used to stimulate leg formation.
Thus grafting an otic placode can induce formation of an extra leg. (I wonder what would happen if you did this experiment in snakes!)
Grafted olfactory placodes also can induce formation of an extra leg.
Earlier experimenters had discovered that grafting an otic placode in contact with a developing eye cup will cause the pigmented retina to differentiate into an extra neural retina.
Development of the 3 geometric axes are controlled separately in limb buds And at 3 different times, by 3 different sets of chemical signals
If surgical rotation is done early enough in development, then regulation occurs, in the sense that whichever part is facing toward the front of the embryo will develop into a thumb, or whatever structure that species has on the anterior side of its arm, etc.
During a later period of development, limb buds are no longer able to regulate (change) their anterior-posterior axis, but can still regulate the dorso-ventral axis!
In effect, that means that the part that would have developed into the palm of the hand can change its fate, and develop the geometry appropriate to the back of the hand, and vice versa, but a rotated limb bud can no longer change where the thumb forms, etc.
Analogous surgical experiments were done with the inner ear (otic placode)
cutting it out and grafting it back in, upside down and backwards, etc.
At a later stage of development, the dorso-ventral and medio-lateral axes are still able to regulate, but the anterior-posterior axis is irreversible.
These rotation experiments were done in salamanders, in the 1910s-30s.
The Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER) is a thickening of the epidermis
that forms along the outer rim of the limb bud
In frog embryos, the AER is comparatively small and indistinct, and for many years, everyone believed that frogs didn't have an AER. But more careful studies found them. The scientific meeting at which this evidence was first presented was in Wales in 1971, & I was in the audience!
Surgical removal of the AER causes failure of the distal structures to develop. Cut the AER off early, then no elbow, forearm, wrist or hand. Cut the AER off later, then no wrist & hand.
This was discovered by Prof. John Saunders, who taught for many years at the State University of New York in Albany, and who visited this department a few years ago, and is one of the most stimulating scientists I have ever met. We had a prolonged barbeque lunch at Allen's out on route 86 north of town.
In sections of bird AERs, the epithelial cells seem to be pinched together at their basal ends, and the ridge is as much a "pucker" as a thickening.
Sections through mouse embryo AERs show a different geometry. It is definitely a thickening, but with some indication of contraction at Both basal and apical surfaces.
Here is a photograph of an oblique, or slanted section through a chicken AER.
The developing tail fins of fish have a similar thickened ridge.
Grafting an extra AER can cause a double wing to form. A mutation in chickens causes double AERs and double wings!
But the AER doesn't itself become any these structures.
It somehow signals to them to form.
There has been much research and several theories on this subject
Fibroblast growth factor 10 seems to be the key signal molecule.
FGF10 can replace the effect of the AER;
(If anybody has done this with snake embryos, I haven't heard about it!
Legless lizards and legless salamanders might also be subject to such experiments.
Another interesting fact is that salamanders (especially newts) are the only kinds of vertebrates that can regenerate cut off legs, and also are the only kind of vertebrate that don't form an AER.
However, during regeneration of salamander legs, an epithelial thickening is formed at the tip of the regenerating limb stump! This thickening is not elongated, however.
I suggest to you that some big conceptual breakthrough is waiting for you to discover!
If the AER cells are a special shape, does their shape mean they are more contractile, or what? Or is it an evolutionary remnant of fish fin shapes?
The proximo-distal axis is considered to be controlled by the AER
The anterior-posterior axis can be reversed by grafting cells from the back side of the limb bud to the front side, which is called the "Zone of Polarizing Activity" (ZPA)
What is the chemical basis of this? Is it retinoic acid? Mirror-image branching legs can be produced by putting retinoic acid onto the anterior side of an early limb bud.
And if you put RA on the regenerating tail stump of a frog, then one or several legs will grow instead of a new tail!
And putting RA on the regenerating leg stump of a salamander will cause the entire proximo-distal sequence of structures to be regenerated, even if only the hand or wrist had been cut off!
The newer evidence is that the sonic hedgehog protein controls the anterior-posterior axis formation.
Organization of fingers somehow depends on certain hox genes: Specifically hoxD 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
The spaces between fingers are made by programmed cell death = "apoptosis" activation of cytoplasmic enzymes, that digest cells from the inside out.
The webbing of a duck's foot results from a lack of apoptosis.
And by the way, many cancer chemotherapy drugs actually work by stimulating apoptosis, rather than by direct harm to the cancer cells. The drugs were intended to kill fast growing cells, but don't really work that way! The dorso-ventral axis of limb development: Can be reversed by removing the entire limb bud ectoderm and turning it upside down. The key protein is thought to be one of the Wnt proteins.
Saunders' quadruplication experiment
Some facts to get your interest:
I) Newts and many other kinds of salamanders can regenerate their legs.
No other vertebrates can do this, except partial regeneration of limbs in frog tadpoles before metamorphosis.
Humans can sometimes regenerate the last digit of fingers and toes, IF the wound is NOT stitched up (which is standard practice).
Regenerating newt legs "re-grow" all the bones (i.e. cartilages), muscles, tendons, blood vessels, connective tissue and skin.
In the stump of the cut limb, cartilage, muscle and other cell type become indistinguishable, "dedifferentiating" back to what looks like their early embryonic state, forming a mass of cells called a blastema, in which rapid cell growth and mitosis replaces the lost cells.
It would be interesting to know whether this subdivision of multi-nucleate muscle cells
has the same contractile-ring mechanism as the ordinary cytokinesis that follow mitosis.
II) Grafting of cartilage and muscle labeled with radioactive labeled DNA, and also the use of genetic markers like nucleolus number, consistently show that each cell remains "loyal" to their original differentiated cell type.
Most experimenters had not expected this, which make the results even more persuasive.
It also contradicts expectations that regeneration should have the same basic mechanism as the original formation of limbs, except if the original development was by sorting out of cells whose differentiation had already been decided, which nobody considers possible.
Limb regeneration is not thought of as a special case of sorting out by differentiated cells, I guess because there is no deliberate dissociation into single or randomly-mixed cells.
Nevertheless, consider that cartilage cells from which the humerus had previously been constructed separate into what seem to be undifferentiated cells, and then re-differentiate as the radius, ulna digits, wrist bones, as well as replacements for the lost parts of the humerus.
Furthermore, consider that the many muscles of the regenerated leg are made of cells that had been parts of different muscles of the upper limb.
Likewise: skin cells, blood vessels, connective tissue & nerves.
III) Salamanders are the only vertebrates whose limb buds do not form an apical ectodermal ridge.
However, during regeneration of salamander, the stumps develop an epithelial thickening which is well-formed, but not elongated in the A-P axis (unlike the AER)
I can't figure out how to interpret this combinations of odd facts, but it must mean something.
IV) If you cut off just the "hand" part of a newt leg, then just that part will regenerate.
BUT: If you cut off just the "hand" part, and then paint the cut surface with retinoic acid, then a whole new leg will regenerate, starting over at the shoulder, and forming an extra elbow, etc.
AND: Newts can regenerate their tails.
The more of a newt leg you cut off, the faster tissues regenerate; So that the total time to completion of regeneration is about the same when you cut off the whole leg as when you cut off just the tip.
V) a) The spaces between fingers and toes are created by the programmed cell death.
So the web of a duck's foot is the primitive condition.
b) The bases of limbs are "sculpted" by regions of programmed cell death.
c) The neck is narrowed by large areas of programmed cell death.
d) The space between your gums and your cheek and limb tissue is created by programmed cell death.
e) The self-destruction of tadpole tails is a classic example of programmed cell death.
f) >98% of lymphocytes self-destruct by programmed cell death. (normally)
g) Defense against viral infections is achieved by inducing programmed cell death of infected cells.
h) Graft rejection occurs by induction of programmed cell death,
by mechanisms that are meant to induce death of virally-infected cells.
i) Many viruses defend themselves by producing proteins that mimic the body's own inhibitors of programmed cell death. (specifically mimics of the bcl-2 protein, which will be discussed below.
j) Much of the death of heart cells during heart attacks, and of brain cells during strokes is claimed to be programmed cell death (setting off self-destruction enzymes), rather than simple destruction.
Therefore, chemicals that inhibit programmed cell death might save many lives.
k) Many anti-cancer drugs are now believed to act by inducing programmed cell death, somewhat selectively in cancer cells, but not so much in normal cells.
Conversely, a whole series of carbon chains attached to phosphates were designed to reduce osteoporosis by either strengthening bone or promoting more bone formation, but are now believed to stimulate programmed cell death in osteoclasts (but unfortunately in lots of other cell types, in addition to osteoclasts, with nasty side-effects)
l) One specific form of cancer is known to be caused (mostly) by too much synthesis of a particular protein named bcl-2, which localizes around mitochondria, and blocks release of reactive molecules (that release being part of how cells self-destruct in programmed cell death.)
B-Cell Lymphoma-2, because this was the second protein to be discovered by close studies of chromosome translocations in human victims of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. There are other proteins called bcl-1, and bcl-3 ; the latter is a cyclin.
Any gene that gets translocated to the chromosome site next to an antibody gene will get made in large amounts in B-lymphocytes, who are "trying" to make antibodies. Note that the same translocation in any other differentiated cell type might have no effect.
m) A large percentage of nematode embryonic cells are eliminated by programmed cell death. (Mutant worms in which this cell death doesn't occur are almost normal. It isn't at all clear what good it does the worm to have so many programmed cell deaths!
A nematode gene was found that is very similar to the human bcl-2 proteins, and replacement of this worm gene by the human bcl-2 gene restores normal development!
n) Another nematode gene, without which programmed cell death will not occur, was found to code for an inactive precursor of a protein-digesting enzyme, called a caspase. Part of the molecule blocks the active site, but can be digested off by a caspase from which its block has already been removed. Thus, activation of one caspase molecule will activate others, in a chain reaction, and they digest the cell from the inside out. Almost all cells of multicellular animals have millions of caspase enzymes dissolved in the cytoplasm.
o) Embryologists had been studying programmed cell death since ~1900
but the word "apoptosis" wasn't invented until 1980.
Necrosis is what you call it when cells just die. (Especially if pieces of dead cell are left) Apoptosis is when they self-destruct.
p) Higher plants have a different kind of self-killing method, that they use to resist infections by induction of death in areas surrounding germs, so as to wall them off. Prof. Dangl is a world leader in research on this important phenomenon.
q) For many years, researchers guessed that there would be several different mechanisms of programmed cell death in animal cells, but apparently caspases are used for all the different examples, from making gaps between fingers to killing anti-self lymphocytes and virally-infected cells.
The greatest researcher on programmed cell death was Prof. Glucksman, of Cambridge University who was a friend of mine and a very wise man, and used to show me slides of programmed cell deaths.
contact the webmaster
back to syllabus